A Connecticut judge has upheld the state’s law eliminating religious exemptions for school vaccine requirements, closing out a four-year legal battle in which families argued that being required to vaccinate their kids before sending them into a room with two dozen other children violated their religious liberty. The court, apparently familiar with how diseases work, disagreed.
The ruling dismisses the final claims in a case that has dragged on since the exemption was first repealed, and it affirms what public health officials have been saying the whole time: a personal aversion to shots does not automatically qualify as a sincerely held religious belief, no matter how firmly it is asserted at a school board meeting.
This is, we should note, exactly the kind of story we love to feature here: a moment when sanity narrowly held the line against a tide of vibes-based legal reasoning. Nobody’s faith is being outlawed. Nobody’s church is being shut down. What’s being outlawed is the idea that “I read something on social media” constitutes a valid basis for skipping the MMR shot.
Connecticut families opposed to the law can, of course, appeal, homeschool, or simply continue being upset on the internet. What they can no longer do is claim a religious carve-out that was never really about religion in the first place.
We did not make this up. The Connecticut Mirror has the receipts.